Humanoids: The Week Everything Quietly Shifted

by | Nov 25, 2025 | Humanoid Robots | 0 comments

The humanoid robotics sector had one of those weeks where the signal finally started to separate from the noise. Not because of one big flashy announcement, but because of several smaller pieces that collectively point to a structural shift: humanoids are now moving from “cool demo on social media” to “people are actually deploying these things”.

And if you run a business, lead a team, or simply want to understand the next industrial platform shift, these aren’t headlines to skim. They’re tea leaves worth reading.

Let’s break down the big developments and what they mean.

1. UBTech begins large-scale shipments of the Walker S2

UBTech, the Chinese robotics heavyweight, quietly dropped the biggest story of the week: they’ve shipped several hundred Walker S2 humanoids into the wild, mainly to automotive and logistics customers.

That puts them ahead of most of the Western players not on marketing, but on units in the field.

As I keep saying, I believe China is going to crush this space in the next decade, like they did solar.

Why it matters:

If hundreds of humanoids are now operating in production environments, we’ve crossed the early boundary of “industrial relevance”. For companies benchmarking timelines, this accelerates everything.

Pros:

  • Moves humanoids from theory to operational case studies.

  • Validates humanoids for repetitive industrial tasks where flexibility matters more than raw strength.

Cons:

  • Unknown performance under sustained load.

  • Unknown cost structure and real ROI.

  • Regulatory and safety frameworks still immature.

Interpretation:

If Chinese manufacturers achieve reliability at scale before Western firms, the global labour market impact will not be gradual. It will be uneven, sudden, and geopolitically asymmetric.

2. Militaries want their own humanoids (but reality says not yet)

Newsweek profiled the “Phantom MK1”, a humanoid being pitched for army, lunar, and Martian operations. The marketing angle was predictable; the scepticism from defence experts was more interesting.

What’s real:

Militaries absolutely do want humanoid-form robots for high-risk scenarios. The incentive is obvious: soldiers are expensive and politically fragile; robots aren’t.

What’s not real (yet):

Walking robots with the reliability, ruggedness, and autonomy needed for battlefield chaos.

Pros:

  • Reduces human exposure to risk.

  • Humanoids fit into environments built for humans, which the military has plenty of.

Cons:

  • High failure rate under extreme conditions.

  • Massive power and battery constraints.

  • Ethical nightmare for policymakers.

Interpretation:

Treat this as early signalling rather than usable capability. Defence sectors often attract hype cycles ahead of practical deployment, but they also pour billions into catching up.

3. Musk declares “work will be optional” thanks to humanoids

The Times of India ran Musk’s latest prediction that humanoids + AI will make “work optional” and make money “irrelevant”. I watched the actual talk that he and Nvidia’s Jensen Huang gave at the Saudi – U.S. Innovation shindig. Think what you like about Elon, but I believe he believes what he says about this stuff. He also recommended we all read Iain Banks’ “Culture” series to get an idea of where things are going (so I’m reading the third book in the series, which is where I left off the last time I got into Banks).

What to take seriously:

The long-term economic shift is real. If general-purpose robots become cheap and reliable, the labour market changes in ways we haven’t prepared for.

What to discount:

The timeline. Musk has a habit of saying “5 years” about things that take 20. But this time he’s actually saying “10-20 years”.

Pros:

  • Raises the right questions: how do we rethink income, wealth distribution, and social roles?

  • Pushes automation into mainstream political debate.

Cons:

  • Creates unrealistic expectations about short-term impact.

  • Oversimplifies real technical constraints.

Interpretation:

The idea is right; the timing might be wrong. But policymakers should be reading these signals now, not later. Keep in mind that once China gets all of its ducks lined up, things could move exponentially.

4. Humanoids in factories: hype is being replaced by deployment

TechInformed reported on humanoids now being deployed as actual “co-workers” on factory floors, particularly in logistics and auto plants.

Some Chinese “dark factories” (no lights, no HVAC, no humans) are now integrating humanoids into workflows that previously required manual support.

Pros:

  • Humans don’t want most of these jobs.

  • Robots reduce downtime and work 24/7.

  • Can adapt to human-designed tools and spaces.

Cons:

  • Worker displacement.

  • Safety risks in transitional periods.

  • High maintenance burden until designs stabilise.

Interpretation:

This is the early phase of the “co-bot” revolution but with legs. It’s the beginning of robots stepping into spaces not originally designed for automation.

5. China’s MagicBot Z1 shows acrobatic, martial-arts agility

A new robot from MagicLab demonstrated high-agility moves: backflips, spinning kicks, even dodging an arrow with a side-flip.

It’s easy to dismiss this as pure showmanship, but the mechanical and control-system sophistication is genuinely impressive. I don’t think my wing chun sifu is going to be replaced anytime soon.

Pros:

  • Shows rapid progress in whole-body control.

  • Indicates that locomotion constraints are shrinking fast.

Cons:

  • Not a real industrial workload.

  • Showcases often hide fragility, overheating, or battery limits.

Interpretation:

Expect advanced mobility to become commodified sooner than people think. Once everyone has a robot that can sprint, climb stairs, or leap, the competitive edge moves to software, autonomy, and cost.

6. Rare-earth demand rises due to humanoid manufacturing scale

Lens Technology announced it’s expanding capacity for humanoid assembly in 2026. Every humanoid requires roughly 3.5–4 kg of rare earth permanent magnets.

Suddenly, material supply becomes strategic.

Pros:

  • Confirms plans for mass production volumes (thousands of units).

  • Signals that cost curves may fall as scale ramps up.

Cons:

  • Rare earth supply chains are geopolitically fragile.

  • Western manufacturers remain heavily dependent on Chinese mining and processing.

Interpretation:

This is the first time the materials-supply side is becoming a visible bottleneck. The sector is growing out of “lab scale” and into “resource footprint” territory.

7. UBTech seeking US$400 million share placement

UBTech is planning a major Hong Kong capital raise to fund its humanoid expansion.

Pros:

  • Indicates investor confidence in humanoids as a growth market.

  • Suggests large-scale manufacturing ambitions.

Cons:

  • Capital raises don’t guarantee product success.

  • The sector is still noisy, crowded, and full of execution risk.

Interpretation:

Money is flowing in. This will accelerate competition, drive down costs, and force weaker players out. It’s the early phase of a coming consolidation wave.

The Bottom Line

This week marks a quiet turning point: humanoids are no longer just YouTube-ready gymnasts. They are entering factories, attracting serious capital, pressuring resource supply chains, and sparking geopolitical and economic debates.

Industrial, military, and economic systems are now preparing for a world where humanoids show up not as prototypes but as line items in budgets.

The next two years will be messy, fast, and uneven. But the direction is clear.

Sources: